Log In


Reset Password

It’s In Your Nature: Monitoring, attempting to protect bird species in jeopardy

There have been 450 bird species identified in the United States and Canada.

Some, like the European starlings, introduced to this continent, are not a species of concern. They certainly don’t need protection.

However, 81 of those 450 bird species are in a position, without special actions to protect them, to disappear. I have, especially in the past 25 years, noticed a significant loss of birds.

Doing some research, I found an organization called Partners in Flight that has gathered information for many years.

PIF has identified and charted six reasons for bird’s vulnerability: breeding distribution; nonbreeding distribution; breeding threats; nonbreeding threats; population sizes; and population trends. The latter looks at the long-term population losses, and those seeing at least a 50% population decline are classified as most vulnerable.

Some birds, like the lesser prairie chicken, have been most affected by the loss of their breeding areas (breeding threats), while the Eastern whip-poor-will is losing ground due to breeding threats and where it winters (nonbreeding threats). In the early 1980s while living in East Penn Township, I listened to whip-poor-wills calling almost nightly. After that, quiet evenings.

PIF has identified those 81 species and documented the causes of their declines. Some species have one major factor influencing their declines, but most however have many. Sixteen of those species I have seen in our region. Local birders, like Dave, Rich and I, have all seen the declines, especially in the last 20 or more years.

Let me refer to a few of which that have seen dramatic losses.

From about 1962 through 1967 I found a number of long-eared owls in a hemlock grove directly behind the Pohopoco Rod and Gun Club clubhouse south of “the Old Big Creek Highway,” now Pohopoco Drive. I believe in 1968 or 1969 the club property was condemned for the construction of Beltzville Dam. The hemlock grove remained, but I believe construction disturbance nearby pushed the owls away. Since the ’80s I look there every year for the owls or their pellets. No luck; they’ve experienced a 91% population decline nationwide.

Golden-winged warblers, losing their habitats in the Appalachians, may soon be on the endangered species list. We used to locate them atop the Pocono Plateau near the pumping station in Penn Forest Township. My last sighting there was in 2013. I’ve returned to that area each spring, sometimes multiple times each year, and have not seen another. The golden-winged warbler faces multiple problems; probably four or five of PIF’s factors listed above. One particular problem is hybridization with the blue-winged warbler. I’ll focus on hybrids in a future column.

(Birds like the prairie, golden-winged and blue-winged warbler actually thrived after large forest tracks were logged. The slow reforestation with few mature trees was to their liking.)

What can we do to help? We somehow have to limit urban sprawl. Housing developments gobbling up grasslands, meadows and forests. Find ways to control the rapid expansion of warehouses and data centers into those same areas.

If a warehouse has to be built, at least require that its roof hold solar panels that otherwise may have been erected in fields or, even worse, in forested areas, ruining even more breeding areas.

Also, cities in major flyways in spring, and especially autumn, need to reduce brightly lit tall buildings, which need patterned films applied to windows to make them look solid.

I was fortunate to have had a chance in my lifetime to observe many of these now-threatened birds. Let’s give our future generations some of those same opportunities. Here are 16 of the 81 vulnerable bird species that have bred, migrated through, or have been seen in the Carbon County area: Bicknell’s thrush, wood thrush, golden-winged warbler, Connecticut warbler, Cape May warbler, prairie warbler, Canada warbler, Kentucky warbler, cerulean warbler, bobolink, red-headed woodpecker, long-eared owl, Eastern whip-poor-will, olive-sided flycatcher, evening grosbeak and black-billed cuckoo. I have seen all but one of these.

True or False: Probably the biggest factor in our imperiled bird species is their loss of nonbreeding areas (wintering areas) in the tropics.

Last Week’s Trivia Answer: Buffleheads rely on Northern flickers to utilize the cavities they excavate in tree trunks for the duck’s nests the following years.

Email Barry Reed at breed71@gmail.com

The red-headed woodpecker has suffered almost a 70% population loss. They are not a deep forest bird like a pileated woodpecker. They prefer an area with scattered large trees and a clear understory. (Similar to a cow pasture with scattered trees.) I am only successful finding one or two in our area every few years. BARRY REED/SPECIAL TO THE TIMES NEWS
The Canada warbler is becoming more elusive for me to find each year. After reading the Partners in Flight information, I now realized it has a population loss of about 60%. Non-breeding threats (using PIF charts) are mainly their issues. Putting it simpler: They are finding less and less overwintering habitats in the tropics. Palm oil production and differing coffee growing techniques are two main causes. Maybe we need to drink less coffee?
The bobolink population is also down about 60%. Breeding threats (in their summer areas) are a chief issue in their decline. The old country farms where a hay crop may have been harvested twice a year are a thing of the past. Today, alfalfa fields get mowed three or more times each summer, basically ruining any chance for them to nest on the ground. Habitat loss in Argentina gives them a double dose of problems.
In the 1980s and ’90s, I could hear black-billed cuckoo’s unusual songs on and off all summer. Lately, I struggle to find one to add to my yearly Carbon County bird list. It’s no wonder, with a population loss of over 65%.
Cape May warblers were a guarantee for me to see every May morning I was birding. Now, after seeing that they have an 80% population loss, I know why. They are losing nonbreeding (overwintering) habitats in the tropics just like the Canada warbler.
Needing scrubby, second growth habitats such as overgrown unused pastures, the prairie warbler is becoming more rare. I have two “go to” spots that still have breeding pairs. Partners in Flight statistics have it listed as losing 55% of its population.
I penned a column last spring in which I described a much quieter May walk in optimum bird habitat. One reason it was quieter is that the wood thrush population is down 55% to 60% drop, according to Partners in Flight. I would really be disappointed if my or your grandchildren wouldn’t be able to hear their beautiful flute-like songs in the morning.
This forest scene may not be pleasing like walking in a forest with towering trees and a fern covered floor, but prairie, golden-winged and blue-winged warblers need this scrubby, second growth timber to thrive. Less timbering in the U.S. and buying foreign timber is one of the factors in the decline of these birds