HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) – Court documents released Wednesday show a grand jury has concluded there are reasonable grounds to charge Pennsylvania’s top prosecutor with perjury, false swearing, official oppression and obstruction after an investigation into leaks of secret grand jury material.

The records made public by the state Supreme Court say the grand jury’s Dec. 18 presentment regarding Democratic Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been sent by the supervising judge to the district attorney in Montgomery County for any prosecution.

The records were released in connection with Kane’s request to the Supreme Court to remove special prosecutor Thomas Carluccio. Kane argues there was no legal basis for his appointment by Montgomery County Judge William Carpenter.

In an unrelated public appearance Wednesday in Philadelphia, Kane maintained her innocence. The special prosecutor had found nothing illegal and instead had to “make things up,” she said.

“We moved to unseal those documents because the people of Pennsylvania should know what’s in there, they should know that we’re fighting this and ... that unsealing shows that there was nothing done wrong,” Kane told reporters. “That special prosecutor looking for leaks from my office in a grand jury didn’t even find them.”

The court filing identified the charges but did not include the full presentment, which typically lays out the basis for any charges.

Kane, a former prosecutor in Lackawanna County, took office in 2013 as the first woman and first Democrat elected as state attorney general. She has not been charged. Carluccio, a Montgomery County lawyer and former prosecutor, and Carpenter are Republicans.

She also said the courts are being used to overturn the election of somebody they don’t like, and she insisted she would not back down.

“I’m in it for everybody and quite honestly, if they can do it to me, they’ll do it to somebody else, and that is unacceptable in my book,” Kane said.

The investigation first became public in a Philadelphia Inquirer report in September. It cited anonymous sources saying a grand jury was looking into a June story in the Philadelphia Daily News that reported on records about a 2009 investigation of the then-Philadelphia president of the NAACP by the attorney general’s office.

Carluccio wrote to the high court Jan. 7 that both Kane and her office have effectively admitted the disclosure of investigative materials came from within the office, “and perhaps from the attorney general herself.”

The high court released the 80 pages of records as it considers a request by Kane that the court invalidate Carluccio’s May appointment by Carpenter.

“In this case, Judge Carpenter exceeded his lawful authority in appointing special prosecutor Carluccio to public office,” wrote Kane’s lawyers in a Dec. 18 filing. “In doing so, he also violated the separation of powers doctrine inherent in the Pennsylvania Constitution.”

Carpenter told the high court in a Dec. 30 opinion that by May, he had “established that there was a leak of secret grand jury information and that the leak most likely came from the Office of the Attorney General.”

He said Kane’s potential involvement meant she had a conflict of interest, so he had to appoint someone else as special prosecutor.

“Clearly, Attorney General Kane could not investigate herself,” Carpenter wrote. “Otherwise, potentially serious violations of grand jury secrecy could go unaddressed.”

Kane testified before the grand jury Nov. 17, confirming to reporters for the first time that she was under investigation.

The judge wrote that there was “strong precedent” allowing grand jury supervisory judges to appoint special prosecutors to look into allegations of grand jury leaks. One unsealed filing is a May 29 letter from Carpenter to then-state Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Castille informing him that he appointed the special prosecutor.

Castille, a Republican, retired at the end of December.

Associated Press writer Maryclaire Dale in Philadelphia contributed to this story.