Skip to main content

Landlord complains about inspections

Published September 20. 2018 02:38PM

A landlord from Coaldale says the borough’s rental inspections single out landlords unfairly.

Daniel Gould said he thinks the inspections are too strict and take place too often.

The town recently hired Systems Design Engineering to handle rental inspections.

“I don’t mind the inspection, I just can’t see it being inspected so many times,” he said.

The borough recently hired Systems Design Engineering to inspect the approximately 150 rental properties located in the borough.

Inspections cost $75. If the property is approved, the next inspection is conducted in two years. If it fails, or the owner doesn’t show for the inspection, the borough charges $75 for a follow-up.

Gould said inspections should take place when a tenant moves in or out of a property, not on an arbitrary schedule.

Councilwoman Claire Remington said there are properties, even located on Gould’s block, where tenants are moving in and out every few months. She said the new inspection schedule is aimed at keeping their landlords in check.

“It’s working out better and it’s weeding out these people, it’s weeding out some of these slum landlords, and preventing them from buying more properties,” she said.

At least one landlord with multiple properties has been a no-show for inspections, borough officials said. They will be charged $75 for each property that requires a follow-up inspection.

The borough created a checklist for property owners laying out what they would be expected to provide. The list includes carbon monoxide detectors on each level, and interconnected smoke alarms.

Gould said he thinks few owner-occupied homes in the town would pass the inspection.

“Some of the things these people want inspected, half of the houses in Coaldale wouldn’t pass. You guys want a lot of stuff done,” he said.

Gould also questioned whether the borough is inspecting the public housing units owned by Schuylkill County, or the Colonial Square apartments. Council’s attorney Robert Yurchak said under the ordinance, if they’re a landlord, they are required to have their units inspected under the ordinance.

Gould said businesses should also be subject to inspections. Yurchak said businesses have to get health inspections and others.

Gould said he couldn’t believe that he was the only landlord in the borough who complained.

“No, everybody complains,” Remington said.

Comments
This is an unfair imposition upon the private property rights of the landlord. I understand why this is being looked at by so many communities, but it overlooks the private homeowner. For those renting to HUD Clients, an inspection is already part of the contract. Private Property Rights was near and dear to our founding fathers, just in case anyone is interested in things like... Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
Restaurants, bars and take-out food businesses get health inspections - but the other stores and offices you visit regularly aren't subject arbitrary inspections.

A landlord is required an inspection when a unit opens for rental. After it passes what do you think they do... make it non-complaint to code? Remove the smoke detectors, outlet covers and hand railings? I don't think so.

If a local landlord owns 6 units... that's $450 per year for an inspector to walk through and look at the same smoke detectors, outlet covers and hand railings that were there last
year.

These inspections are done by private companies. Small, boroughs are each awarding them thousands in revenue per year for these inspections. In exchange for what?
Typical Republican, collect the rent and Let them live in squalor! Republican deviant slum lords!

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

December 2018

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      
     

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed