Skip to main content

Palmerton reinstates principal

Published April 17. 2019 12:31PM

On the sidelines for a year-and-a-half, Palmerton Area High School Principal Paula Husar will soon be back on the job.

Husar was suspended Sept. 7, 2017, when Palmerton Superintendent Scot Engler recommended her dismissal to the school board and cited over 20 charges against her.

On Tuesday night, the board voted 7-2 to uphold nine months of Husar’s suspension, ending it on June 7, 2018, and reinstating her as principal.

Board members Kathy Fallow and Barry Scherer voted against the suspension.

According to attorney Robert Yurchak, who presided over Husar’s dismissal hearing in front of the board, Palmerton’s administration will be contacting her about when she’ll return to work.

“Mrs. Husar is obviously very happy about the board’s decision to return her to her job as principal,” Husar’s attorney Mark Bufalino said after the decision. “We continue to disagree she should have been disciplined in any manner, but I think the board’s vote tonight says a lot more about Mr. Engler’s actions than it does about Mrs. Husar.”

Engler did not attend Tuesday’s meeting.

Individual votes

Before the board chose to vote on upholding part of Husar’s suspension instead of terminating her, it voted on whether it felt sufficient evidence had been presented to terminate her on eight individual charges.

The closest vote, a 5-4 decision, came on the charge that Husar engaged in persistent negligence in the performance of her duties as outlined in the dismissal charges. On that charge, directors Charles Gildner, Scherer, Tammy Recker, Josh Smale and Josann Harry voted that there was sufficient evidence, while Fallow, Baumgardt, Earl Paules and Sherry Haas disagreed.

Several of the other votes were unanimous in that the entire board felt there was insufficient evidence to terminate Husar. Those charges included that Husar was insubordinate on Sept. 7, 2017, by failing to report to the district office for a Loudermill hearing or to return her district belongings, that Husar caused a serious disruption in the district when she failed to return school property to the administration office and caused rumors and gossip to spread, and that Husar failed to adequately address or inform Engler of ethnicity-based harassment complaints leading to a Pennsylvania Human Relations complaint filed against the district.

On two charges, Scherer was the lone board member to find there was enough evidence for termination. Those charges were that Husar intentionally attempted to discredit Engler by making false and derogatory comments about him, and that Husar failed to comply with a board policy related to field trips and the appropriate number of chaperones.

The lone remaining charge, that Husar harassed and intimidated fellow employees, had a split vote. Scherer, Recker and Harry thought there was enough evidence for that charge to support termination. Smale, Gildner, Fallow, Baumgardt, Haas and Paules did not.

“When you look at the charges that failed tonight,” Bufalino said, “I think it speaks to how hollow they were.”

Audience reaction

A majority of the people in attendance Tuesday burst into applause when Husar was reinstated.

“I don’t know why we’re in this position,” resident Doris Zellers said before the vote. “I think there could have been a less costly solution. This truly is not Palmerton’s finest hour.”

Keri Henry called Husar’s situation a travesty, saying the high school has been without its principal long enough.

“This should have never happened to her,” Henry said. “She made a difference to so many kids in the district.”

Following the meeting, however, high school guidance secretary Diane Smelas, who was a district witness during the dismissal hearing, questioned how the working relationship would be with Husar coming back.

“How are our evaluations going to work?” she said. “I know many of you support her, but she was very difficult to work with.”

Recap

The dismissal hearing began in late January 2018, with Engler describing an ongoing pattern of behavior leading to a “toxic work environment,” and Husar claiming Engler retaliated against her for an evaluation of him she gave to the school board.

During the hearing, which spanned 15 nights over the course of more than a year, testimony included Husar admitting to giving confiscated tobacco back to a student following a field trip, high school secretary Terri Freed testifying about inconsistent discipline patterns, and Husar being accused of removing a special education student from a high school classroom following a truancy hearing and putting the student in a guidance office conference room, going against what was called for in the student’s individualized education program.

Husar, meanwhile, said in March 2016 she was asked to meet with the school board to discuss Engler’s job performance. Despite assurances to the contrary, she said she was worried what she said would get back to him.

“I knew if I was going to do it that I would be honest, and I knew if I was honest that it might not work out so well for me,” she testified. “I wrestled with it for a while before I finally did it.”

Before meeting with the board about Engler, Husar said she received all fives, the highest score possible, on her evaluation in 2014 when she was principal of the junior and senior high schools.

The hearing concluded on March 26.

Going forward

“We’ll continue to weigh our options as we go forward, but right now Mrs. Husar is singularly focused on what means most to her, and that is getting back to her job as principal and her dedication to the parents and students of this district,” Bufalino said.

Comments
Scherer was in Englers back
Pocket. All along. He showed his colors(idiot. Smelas. Just do your job n you have nothing to worry bout. That simple. Not hard to figure out.
Accross the state, when a board member rubber stamps those they were elected to oversee the district suffers.

The students suffer, the financials suffer, and the community gets divisive. Rubber stampers, those the fail in those duty to honor their Oath with fidelity are at the root of ths issue.

Citizen David F Bradley, Sr.
There is so much more to this issue than is stated. It amazes me how school boards make decisions and choices, based on poor information and lackadaisical research.
You could enlighten us. Based on the articles I read, this sounded like a crock from the beginning. If there is something that was in evidence but the reporter failed to mention, that would be of value. Only if it was in evidence though.
The reporting of the Times News is often considered kess than investigative journalism.
Governments are held accountable by the freedom of the press. Sticky advertisers. Solicitors, and other press relationships with the districts cause for the weak distribution of information in general. Access to sports and stories that drive readership can cause less the informative reporting. When the press becomes the mouthpiece for the existing regime read the stories more carefully and demand transparency. Often the press on small communities are monopolistic in nature a function of their captive audience. After all were else can you get information on these subjects? Until our governments are transparent the media filter will always cast a dim light. We need Justice Barndeis' bright Sunshine to disinfect the government and give the people back the authority and power granted in our constitution. Until then, the press is more or less, just the press agents for the existing regimes.

Sincerely,

Citizen David F. Bradley Sr.
Many districts lack transparency. Without a transparent government, district fester. Without good board leadership.the authority of government is abdicated to those they were elected to oversee.

District boards across the state fail to collect pertinent data to manage those they were elected to oversee. And across the state the attorneys benefit from the chaos, and lack of board oversight. Boards need to trust but verify.

Those elected are responsible to report to stakeholders ALL the actions of government. The board is responsible for so much in this government educational entitlement program. Accross the state we witness boards as they play dignitary, using power for favoritism, nepotism and cronyism. Rubber stampers are at the root of the State's local control system. Where the citizen actually have the authority to oversee the board. Elect a board that is willing to listen to the people, and the people, the ones that see all the disparity. will do the job to oversee government that oversee the administration that oversees the staff. The system can work. The people need to restore a government of, by and for the people.

Sincerely,

Citizen David F. Bradley Sr.
Aren’t you the guy who falsely accused a lehighton asst principal of things. N didn’t want to
Leave someone’s property?
MCCOYS.MOM perhaps instead of condemning a group of community members who spent countless sleepless nights trying to arrive at a decision of justice and what was best for OUR school district, you should have presented whatever information you may have had to the attorney so it could have been introduced with the other 'evidence', or lack thereof. Or perhaps YOU could have been part of the barrage of his lackey's to lie for him because they are afraid of his retaliation towards those who defy him. And if the boards decision was based off of poor information and lackadaisical research the fault lies with the school solicitor and the Scott Engler, see HE was the one who brought this before the board, and in true Engler fashion,it was done half assed and at the cost the taxpayers.
Diane Smelas, I hope you read this, “How are our evaluations going to work?” “I know many of you support her, but she was very difficult to work with.” Let this taxpayer fill you in on something you should already know. YOU WORK FOR US! You and everyone else that may not be thrilled at the outcome of the hearings, you were hired to do a job, so do it and you have nothing to worry about in regards to your evaluation. As for being hard to work with, could it be that Mrs. Husars' expectation that her staff do their job is more than some of you are capable of doing? May I suggest that you treat her with the utmost respect due ANY supervisor you work under!!!
I agree. She needs to do her job. She is just a secretary from what I hear. So if u don’t like it go get another job.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

September 2019

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed