Skip to main content

Three squares a day how about six?

Published June 18. 2013 05:02PM

Q. If you want to control your weight, is it better to eat three meals a day, or should you eat more, smaller meals?

There is no scientifically proven answer to this question. Until there is, I'd suggest simply reducing your total food intake for each day until your weight goes down.

(Personal note: I've struggled to keep pounds off all my life. I've learned that calories count. You take in more than you burn, you gain weight. You burn more than you eat, you lose weight. Exercise helps, but the calorie burn-off usually doesn't amount to much. The best exercise is pushing yourself away from the table.)

Eating a bunch of small meals a day instead of breakfast-lunch-dinner is part of the popular media right now, which means you should be hearing "fad alert" in your head. Here are some of the claims:

• The body burns calories to digest. Eating six to eight meals a day enables your body to use more calories to aid digestion.

• Eating lots of meals rather than three will boost metabolism and control blood sugar.

• More meals means less stored fat in the body.

• When people consume the same number of calories in a single daily meal rather than three, they show significant increases in blood pressure, total cholesterol levels and levels of bad LDL cholesterol.

• Eating every three-to-four hours can ward off hunger and prevent binges that lead to weight gain.

• Eating more often helps regulate proper digestion to prevent gastrointestinal problems.

• Eight meals a day will increase energy levels and accelerate muscle growth.

To repeat, there is no proof that eating more frequently does any of the above.

My own conclusion about weight control was confirmed in an editorial that appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. A team of nutrition researchers concluded that weight loss comes down to "how much energy (or calories) is consumed as opposed to how often or how regularly one eats."

However, there was a recent study that indicated we may be better off eating only three meals a day. The study was done on mice, so the findings have to be confirmed by tests on humans.

Satchidananda Panda, a regulatory biologist at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, led the study published by the journal Cell Metabolism.

Panda and his team put groups of mice on different eating regimens for 100 days. Mice in two of the groups ate high-fat, high-calorie food. Half of them were allowed to snack throughout the night and day. The other mice had access to food only for eight hours at night, when they were most active.

The mice that ate only for eight hours were almost as lean as mice in a control group that ate regular food. But the mice that ate around the clock became obese, even though they consumed the same amount of fat and calories as their counterparts on the time-restricted diet.

If you would like to read more columns, you can order a copy of "How to be a Healthy Geezer" at

The Times News, Inc., and affiliates (TIMES NEWS) do not endorse or recommend any medical products, processes, or services or provide medical advice. The views of the author do not necessarily state or reflect those of the TIMES NEWS. The article content is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician, or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar


October 2017


Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed


STEP-Up Tamaqua to meet Monday

40.798347, -75.970851

STEP-Up Tamaqua will...

Man faces charges for shooting his dog

40.8014826, -75.6101867

Charges have been fi...

Extension hosts annual dinner

40.7986942, -75.8104747

The Carbon County Ex...

Reader Photo Galleries