Donna Crum said her 3-year-old granddaughter drew a picture in pre-school with a caption that read, "When I grow up I want to help animals."
Crum, who has 20 years of experience rescuing and volunteering with animals, is visibly moved by her granddaughter's statement.
During a recent interview, that was Crum's only weak moment.
When it comes to animals and animal rescue, she takes a no-nonsense approach. Crum punctuates her statements with experience and conviction. She's all about the animal and her actions back up the words.
"I do have a network of very good people and we work together to rescue animals," Crum added, "I am only one of the voices of the animal."
Through the efforts of people like Crum, and organizations such as the County Animal Response Team (CART), animals today are treated in a more humane way than in the past. Many animals are rescued and euthanizing is used only when necessary.
Yet, there are too many situations where animal cruelty still exists. A lot of educating and awareness needs to take place to ensure all animals are properly cared for and animal cruelty ends.
Each county has its own CART team, which is part of the State Animal Response Team (SART). The County Animal Response Team is used for large emergency rescues such as the rescue that took place after the 2009 gas explosion at a kennel in Franklin Township.
CART was also there in March when a horse fell into the Lehigh River. It was so 'spooked,' it wouldn't move, and rescuers took more than 45 minutes to move the mare to dryer ground.
Other situations, however, such as ensuring wounded and hurt animals, receive medical attention and rescuing feral cats can solely rely on the expertise and ability of the Animal Control Officer (ACO).
Recently, Crum applied for the posted position of Animal Control Officer (ACO) in Slatington.
After presenting her qualifications, the council voted 2-3 for Stephanie Pretzman, a stay-at-home mom who "likes animals."
Despite not being appointed, Crum said, "The Slatington Council deserves 'kudos,' for funding an ACO, because most municipalities do not."
In today's society, many good things can come out of having an ACO. Unfortunately, many municipalities and counties consider it as more of a financial burden on their budgets.
Crum's qualifications, which include certifications in criminal justice and private investigation, also include animal first aid, CPR and animal husbandry through Penn State. She holds the title of ACO through the national animal control association, and spends scads of time researching animal laws and ordinances that would improve conditions.
Changing policies, procedures and ordinances in the municipalities is Crum's main focus.
"I'm trying to work with the Carbon County commissioners to try to make a difference," she said. "The police department has been overwhelmed. Some boroughs, such as Lehighton, are sending their officers for training, showing that things are already changing in a positive way."
Crum believes that bringing awareness is one step closer to the goal.
"We learn unfortunately by the horrific things that happen," she said.
Foreclosure rates are adding to the animal problem. Crum cites an instance where nine horses, nine dogs, one goat, 13 chickens and a cat are on a property where the owner was locked out by the bank.
"I disassociate myself with the leasee and the bank. My concerns are with the animals," she explained.
The bank is complying and all of the animals are being taken care of.
On Aug. 20, from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., Lehighton Borough Park (upper and lower) will be the venue for "'Rockin' Rescue.'" Funds raised will benefit abused animals in Carbon County.
Depending on the weather, there will either be live animals or pictures of animals that are available for rescue.
"We want to educate and make a difference," Crum said. "If people don't know any better they can't change. If they don't know where to call they don't call. If they don't know where to go they do nothing. It's up to humans. Paws cannot dial 911 when they need help."

Comments
To the commenter “The Truth”, thank you so much for that last stab at Donna and for getting in the last word, even after everything was clarified.
I’m sure that we’re all confident that comments coming from a commenter called “The Truth” MUST be true and when “the real pictures come out” I’m sure we’re also very confident that Ms. Crum will be found guilty of NOT trespassing as you have admitted to doing.
Once again, for clarification, what Ms. Crum said was “under 5511c, Cruelty to Animals, this was a BORDERLINE case”. The key words here are “under 5511c”, as in, this is not coming from Ms. Crum.
See, you have to read AND interpret what is being said in its proper context, which you don’t seem to have done, hence your relentless stabs at Donna.
At some point, hopefully, you will come to realize that the good guys must follow the rules and go by the book, whereas the bad guys do not. So, the good guys are restricted by the rules in what they can do against those that have no rules.
As for “running our mouth and defending”, if someone is going to make exaggerated statements about things that were never said or even insinuated AND were exhaustively clarified as to have not been said or insinuated, would you want no one to come to YOUR defense if it were you they were bashing?
Perhaps you would want everyone to quietly allow mistruths about you to go unchallenged so that others may possibly interpret them as being “The Truth”? But then, that would be a contradiction to “The Truth”, wouldn’t it? Hmm. "The Truth" sure can be confusing.
It was alleged by “The Truth” below on Aug. 14th that Ms. Crum “had full rights to care for their animals (but) were no where to be found”.
Now, we all know that you wouldn’t go and call yourself “The Truth” and then have nothing to back up your claim. That would be unwise. So, please share your documentation with us so that we can all collectively bash Ms. Crum based on your public allegations AND PROOF against her.
Since we’re all stabbing at Donna Crum, I guess my gang mentality must be kicking in, so I will too; DAMN YOU DONNA CRUM FOR ABIDING BY THE LAW!! Now lets all turn over a car and start it on fire!!!
Don’t y’all go runnin’ yer mowthz an’ defendin’ now, ya hear?
The end result is not one of those animals were saved PERIOD. The real pictures with come out and then everyone can make there own judgement on this "borderline case". Before every one else starts running there mouth and defending maybe you should know that everyone of those people who posted were extremely familiar with the situation and was there with those animals when SHE was not. As for me I have been involved with several rescues as well and this was not a borderline case.
Where are you people reading that DONNA CRUM is SOLELY credited for rescuing the animals on the foreclosed property??? I read this article several times & NOWHERE in it did I read that DONNA CRUM rescued those animals, DONNA CRUM was the driving force of rescuing those animals, DONNA CRUM oversaw the rescuing of the animals, DONNA CRUM was the only person to have done anything about those animals, blah blah blah.
Because she’s pictured w/ the goat, the horses & there are literally only 7 sentences in which that particular matter is referenced, you’re somehow interpreting that she is EXCLUSIVELY being praised for doing something about this??? WHAT??? Where?? How?
Here are the ACTUAL sentences:
“Foreclosure rates are adding to the animal problem. Crum cites an instance where nine horses, nine dogs, one goat, 13 chickens and a cat are on a property where the owner was locked out by the bank. "I disassociate myself with the leasee and the bank. My concerns are with the animals," she explained. The bank is complying and all of the animals are being taken care of.” CAPTION – “Crum examines the leg of a goat she has been caring for after the bank forced the owner off the property.” CAPTION – “Donna Crum is surrounded by three out of nine horses who continue to live on a farm after the bank 'locked out' the owner.”
THAT’S IT!! NOTHING MORE!! It doesn’t say Ms. Crum made the bank foreclose on the owners, it doesn’t say that she did or is doing anymore than what she is actually doing. But to YOU it sounds like this article is saying that SHE did EVERYTHING, so you slander her every chance you get? What is wrong w/ you???
Well, if she has all of these credentials, then why doesn’t she blahblahblah. Better yet, why don’t you stop generating uninformed assumptions about other people, mind your own business, go do something positive & stop writing stupid things about decent people?
I don’t know what magic glasses you people are reading this news article through, but I certainly don’t get any impression whatsoever from this article that is in anyway akin to what the hell you people are saying. It sounds more like y’all got some kinda bizarre agenda.
All I can say about this is just WOW! The fact that this problem was allowed to become this bad just blows my mind. How many years has this kennel been in operation , and yet allowed to keep breeding dogs? Why wasn't this resolved when there was 100+ dogs on the property? Or how about when the owners of the property attacked a camera man on the news crew? Or when it was brought to court about the starving horses? Yet the "rescue team" that did it shot themselves in the ass by saying the horses needed shelter , when it isn't an actual law stating that horses/livestock need to be provided a covered shelter. I personally have been through the owners kennels when they were "up and running", the poor conditions were for everyone to see . Yet people continued to allow them to keep breeding " AKC registered" dogs. The issue should have been addressed many many many years ago. As for the horses , they have been standing in that eaten down pasture for um what 5 or more years now? It took a bank foreclosing on the property to "save" the horses. The laws in every state have loop holes in them where owners of neglected animals can slip through. Instead of giving credit to one person who helped , why not recognize everyone who helped with the animals? It really does sound like this crum lady did everything when she did not. If this crum lady has all these credentials, why isn't she working for the humane society of the united states. Where she could be putting her knowledge to good use instead of volunteering ? People need to realize this isn't just a county issue. It's from coast to coast. Hoarding cases and puppy mills are a dime a dozen. It's sad to see so many people miss informed about the facts and what really happened there. The story could have gone alot deeper. I hope people see what happens when no one does anything for years at a time.
It is a darn shame that some people can only sit back and make nasty comments about those actually doing something to help the animals. i understand that some people may not be physically capable of doing actual feeding, cleaning etc for animals in need but there are other things you can do. if you are so upset about animal neglect and cruelty, write to your state reps about changing the laws, show up at the county commissioners meetings and let your grips be known. don't sit behind your computer and annonymously slander people who are trying to help. that doesn't help anyone, it's childish and it certainly isn't getting the animals the help they need. Something most of you are loosing site of is that Mrs. Crum is a VOLUNTEER. She is not being paid by Carbon County to enforce and investigate cruelty/neglect complaints. Yet as a VOLUNTEER, she is doing what ever she can to try and help the animals that are brought to her attention. Like any other volunteer, she has a life, family and other responsibilities. Yet she paid her own way through college to learn the laws, rules and regulations that govern animal cruelty & neglect. So it appears to me, if she feels the laws need to be ammended, then maybe some of you who live in the county can help get those laws ammended so that people like Mrs. Crum can actually get something accomplished when it comes to enforcing those laws. So if you really want to see something happen to get animal cruelty charges brought against violators, do something to help get the changes made or sit back and do nothing. if you aren't going to try and make a difference for a positive outcome, who does it help to bash people who are? who does it help to slander people who are? it's certainly not helping the animals that you say you care about.
Mrs. Crum is only one person, one VOLUNTEER, and couldn't possibly care for all those animals in this case alone. Again, she is a VOLUNTEER, with a life and family that need her help also. She is not a super woman who can eliminate all cases of cruelty and neglect against animals with the wave of a hand. yet many of the commentors seem to expect her to do just that. She has been to several county commissioners meetings asking for their help and has also asked for community support for her causes yet the community has not been present at these meeting. I can only assume they were too busy writing slanderous and annonymous comments about her online. it's rediculous and all your are doing is not helping the animals whom you claim to care about. leave the negative comments go and get up and do something about finding true help for the animals. yes, we all have a right to express our opinions about things, be they positive or negative but there is something very wrong when all someone does is slander/down grade someone who is trying to help and they aren't doing anything themselves to help.
Mrs. Crum may not have performed as many of you think she should have but then where were you when these animals needed care & feeding? Did you accompany the Carbon County Animal Rescue Team to help them? Did you go to school on your own dime to learn the laws and how to function within them so that you could advise the bank personell how to proceed within them? Did you make numerous phone calls to those in authority during the "YEARS" the neglect was going on to report it and make sure someone/anyone went out and did something about it? did you attend county commissioners meetings to show support to change some of the laws that need changing? did you vote people into office who are strong on sanctions of animal cruelty and neglect? did you offer to donate time, food, money etc. to help with the care and feeding of these animals once the owner was out of the picture? did you offer to donate time, supplies, food etc to those who were caring for the animals and show your support to them?
Mrs. Crum does not "...only care about feral cats..." I know from personal, one on one experience in working with her that is not even close to the truth. if that were true she would not have spent 12-13 hours a day for 15 days straight organizing & supervising the care & feeding at the muskit kennels when they were closed down. how many of you were there helping the cart team? how many of you even called to see what you could do to help? If that statement were true, she would not have been so quick to help out the horse that was stuck in the lehigh river for hours. how many of you were there to help? if that were true, she would not have been on the horrible scene at pizzaz kennels during the horrific fire. how many of you were there to help? how many called to see what they could do to help?
next time you want to site annonymously behind your computer and slander someone who is taking action to try and get something done, try thinking about it for a split second before you do it and maybe you will come up with some way you can actually help and not just use excuses and nasty words to try and knock down someone who IS trying to do something. ask yourself what you can do to help the situation, not what you can do to make things worse.
Mrs. Crum, thank you for everything you do for the animals and the community in spite of small minds that cannot reason appropriately. It is my personal opinion that Slatington Bureau truly lost a terrific animal advocate when they hired someone else. However, maybe the person holding the position will find a way to get the education & training she needs to do a great job. At least she knows who to call when she gets stuck & that in and of itself speaks volumes for her willingness to do what is right.
Thank you for setting the record straight Ms. Crum & NO THANKS to all of the perpetrators of the SLANDER CAMPAIGN below. You must all be very proud of yourselves for having provided your own “lopsided reporting”.
For goodness sake people, did you even freakin’ call Ms. Crum to get her side of the story? DUUHHH, NO. Gee, what a concept that would be to get the FULL STORY before you go off half-cocked & publicly slander someone. DAMN! You people are nasty!
Now go redeem yourselves & save an animal.
Ms. Crum, THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING that you do to help the animals. We need more people like you, a proactive, motivated advocate for the animals. It’s too bad you can’t help the slander animals below too, as they seem mentally malnourished. There are MANY people who greatly appreciate your efforts & dedication. THANK YOU DONNA CRUM!
Have you personally been to this property, or seen the conditions They were horrific, in no way was it borderline. These people neglected this animals and if you look at Crums definition of neglect, this place defines it. It was a big task to take on, but if Donna Crum is really as amazing as you defend, she could have made this happen. She made friends with this person and basically tried to help her keep her animals. Donna Crum could have been a hero in this but I think that is was a big task, and these were bad people, and it was just easier to let it go. So many people would have been willing to help, but maybe she had to much pride to reach out to someone else, considering this article makes it sound like such a horrible thing that Stephanie had asked for Donnas help at one point. Maybe once again rather than bashing Stephanie Prutzman she should have less hate towards her and work together to make better things happen rather than just trying to be better than her.
Monroe Animal Lover, what the hell are you talking about? Your assumptions are WAY beyond farfetched and have no basis in fact whatsoever.
The “article” says nothing about Stephanie Pretzman calling Donna Crum on the telephone, but rather that was stated in a comment below. That’s your first falsehood.
Your second falsehood is that no one ever said Ms. Crum “is amazing”. However, she has been recognized as being more involved than most people in helping animals.
Your third oddity is saying “I THINK that is was a big task, but MAYBE she had to much pride”. Okay, so by saying "think" and "maybe", you obviously have no idea, but you’re making things up and throwing out derogatory comments anyway? What’s up with that?
And to top it off, your most BIZARRE statement of all, “Maybe once again rather than bashing Stephanie Prutzman she should have less hate towards her and work together to make better things happen rather than just trying to be better than her.”
WHAT??? Where on God’s green Earth did you come up with an assumption like that???
Ms. Crum NEVER bashed Ms. Pretzman or expressed any hatred toward her, and if you’re referring to the comments below, then you’re still way off of the mark. There was no bashing or hatred of any kind expressed in that statement either. It was said that Ms. Pretzman wasn’t the better qualified candidate and has no formal training. What’s the big freakin’ deal? It seems as though you’re being intentionally antagonistic for no particular reason.
Seriously, in all fairness, if you were running a business with your own money which dealt with animal control, would you hire someone who “likes animals more than people” or someone with YEARS of experience? Assuming you’re not entirely nuts, you would hire the QUALIFIED PERSON…. RIGHT? HELLO? HELLO??? Anyone home???
It’s amazing that people can actually have enough ability to read and write, but then incorrectly interpret what they are reading and regurgitate it back in gross misinterpretations, all while presenting it as fact. Come on people, get a clue already. You’re not doing the human race any justice. As a matter of fact, I think I may like animals more than people at this point too. Jeez.
First of all, Let me say this is so to speak coming "RIGHT FROM THE SOURCE".....
Many of you have had basically slandered my name throughout this article and I would like to set the story straight.
First of all, I did not see ONE of you there ON THE PROPERTY ACCESSING the ANIMALS, nor trying to help these animals in any way. I, as an ACO, HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE LAW. Under 5511c, Cruelty to Animals, this was a BORDERLINE case, and even if I had wanted to for the mere sake of the animals remove them, I was not allowed BY LAW. The 5511(c) reads as follows:
(c) Cruelty to animals-
(1) A person commits an offense if he wantonly or cruelly illtreats, overloads, beats, otherwise abuses any animal, or neglects any animal as to which he has a duty of care, whether belonging to himself or otherwise, or abandons any animal, or deprives any animal of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter or veterinary care, or access to clean and sanitary shelter which will protect the animal against inclement weather and preserve the animal's body heat and keep it dry.
I personally spoke with a DISTRICT JUSTICE who advised me that a search warrant to secure and remove said animals would not be possible due to insuffient evidence and the lack of medical evidence backed by a BOARD CERTIFIED VETERARIAN that these animals were yes, questionable case of POSSIBLE NEGLECT, however, without a certainty and testimony of a EXPERT WITNESS, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, there was absolutely nothing I could do BY THE PA LAW. Please people, instead of bashing me, write to your STATE REPRESENTATIVE and ASK them to back the House bills that will strengthen the cruelty laws so WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. Unfortunately, I'm out there EVERY DAY, VOLUNTEERING and I would love to act on my emotions and my heart strings,but it's not easy, doing what I do, and as I see, many are to quick to judge decisions that are made BY THE LAW. I perhaps do not agree with them, but I must follow them. If EVERYONE on this page who was quick to comment would VOLUNTEER 3 hours per week at a local shelter, or rescue, GEE, THEN WHAT A DIFFERENCE THAT WOULD MAKE.......I'd invite anyone , anytime, to go to HARRISBURG, and become an ACO, Walk a day in my shoes, and have to see what I see and do what I do. BUT UNFORTUNATELY UNTIL PA LAWS CHANGE, ALL HANDS are tied and yes, the animals are always the ones to pay for it. SPCA was there in prior incidents,(over several years, I might add) and also, their hands were as tied as mine. Want to HELP ME MAKE A DIFFERENCE?, HELP ME HELP THEM! Write to your STATE REP, and ASK THEM to support the Housebills. You're voting in the very people that constrain ACO's from doing their jobs, by not supporting STRONGER, MORE SPECIFIC ANIMAL CRUELTY LAWS and UNTIL the Vagueness of these laws become crystal, we have no right enforcing GREY AREAS.
Honestly Donna I relieze that you have done great things for some animals. But one people that are writing have written letters, but these animals were beaten, people have seen them getting shoved into their garage where they used to try to breed these animals and watched them get beaten if the male didn't jump her bones right away, people made phone calls wrote letters and nothing got done. Animals were living in their own feces and horses were not fed for days on end. There is no way to tell what is done with these animals unless you continue to check back daily. I understand that you are a volenteer, and its appreciate, but this article makes you sound like you cared for these animals for thirty days and makes the bank look like horrible people for the lockout. Sorry that is what happens when you don't pay your morgage for years. Maybe if you gave the bank and caregiver a little credit for caring for these animals and not making it look like you really cleaned out kennels and walked Rotties that haven't been out of those small pens for probably months, people wouldn't be so disturbed and defending them. I personally have volenteered at shelters and will be supporting the local rescue in monroe county this weekend at the cancer society. So you have no right to say we arent either. Also you said to several people that you had to "befriend" these people in order to get what you wanted? I don't think that approach is working. I just think that this was a very misleading article about this foreclosure property.
Where are you people reading that DONNA CRUM is SOLELY credited for rescuing the animals on the foreclosed property??? I read this article several times & NOWHERE in it did I read that DONNA CRUM rescued those animals, DONNA CRUM was the driving force of rescuing those animals, DONNA CRUM oversaw the rescuing of the animals, DONNA CRUM was the only person to have done anything about those animals, blah blah blah.
Because she’s pictured w/ the goat, the horses & there are literally only 7 sentences in which that particular matter is referenced, you’re somehow interpreting that she is EXCLUSIVELY being praised for doing something about this??? WHAT??? Where?? How?
Here are the ACTUAL sentences:
“Foreclosure rates are adding to the animal problem. Crum cites an instance where nine horses, nine dogs, one goat, 13 chickens and a cat are on a property where the owner was locked out by the bank. "I disassociate myself with the leasee and the bank. My concerns are with the animals," she explained. The bank is complying and all of the animals are being taken care of.” CAPTION – “Crum examines the leg of a goat she has been caring for after the bank forced the owner off the property.” CAPTION – “Donna Crum is surrounded by three out of nine horses who continue to live on a farm after the bank 'locked out' the owner.”
THAT’S IT!! NOTHING MORE!! It doesn’t say Ms. Crum made the bank foreclose on the owners, it doesn’t say that she did or is doing anymore than what she is actually doing. But to YOU it sounds like this article is saying that SHE did EVERYTHING, so you slander her every chance you get? What is wrong w/ you???
Well, if she has all of these credentials, then why doesn’t she blahblahblah. Better yet, why don’t you stop generating uninformed assumptions about other people, mind your own business, go do something positive & stop writing stupid things about decent people?
I don’t know what magic glasses you people are reading this news article through or how you can even read it w/ your heads so far up you’re own behinds, but I certainly don’t get any impression whatsoever from this article that is in anyway akin to what the hell you people are saying. It sounds more like y’all got some kinda bizarre agenda.
Slatington - Kudos for making the right choice and NOT hiring Donna Crum!!
Times News - shame on you for allowing such a misleading article to appear in your paper and online!
I was completely appalled by the misleading captions under these pictures let alone the article. Please report the truth. Include truthful information on someone's achievements, and don't take what they say at face value... check your facts. A simple phone call to the bank representative on the foreclosure mentioned in the article may have eliminated some inaccurate reporting.
"Donna Crum examines the leg of a goat she has been caring for after the bank forced the owner off the property." That caption implies that the bank caused the injury by forcing the owner off the property... total inaccuracy. Secondly, it sounds like Ms. Crum actually came every day and cared for this animal. Ms. Crum rarely visited the property and did nothing about the horrid conditions of these animals for YEARS.
"Donna Crum is surrounded by three out of nine horses who continue to live on a farm after the bank 'locked out' the owner. That statement and picture implies that she took care of feeding these horses and the picture sways the public to think the ribs are showing on that horse because of the bank lockout! Again, lets get our facts straight. That round hay bale in the picture... guess what, that was the BANK feeding those poor animals. At least for 30 days after the bank lockout, the remaining animals on that property FINALLY received food and care paid for by the bank. The owner never checked or cared about these creatures.
And Donna Crums's statement, "I disassociate myself with the leasee and the bank. My concerns are with the animals," she explained. Concern.. where was her concern over the past several years when these animals went days without food, or minimal food and horrible care. These former property owners had their kennel license revoked due to unsatisfactory conditions (https://www.padogs.state.pa.us/PublicKennels/SearchKennelInspections.aspx) and the Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection filed a lawsuit against them for selling SICK dogs that were MALNOURISHED and not given proper medical care. (http://www.tnonline.com/2011/feb/12/suit-filed-against-local-kennel-accu...)
They were NOT good people. They never took care of their animals yet Ms. Crum did NOTHING!!! I'm sure Ms. Crum has done some good in the past for some animals, but lets not glorify her as she actually turned her back on the poor animals mentioned in this article. Perhaps she was intimidated by the owners, or felt it was too big a task to take on. I guess we will never know the truth.
Well those poor, thin, scared horses... and that injured goat she so cared about ... they were all crammed on a trailer and hauled away. If they are lucky, they would have been sent to slaughter where at least their suffering would come to an end. But sadly they probably now some other county or states problem. Shoved somewhere new without food and care, wondering what happened to that good food that had the past 30 days. I just hope that wherever they end up their is a state/county humane organization that will actually HELP them.
To everyone who did keep calling the various agency's and trying to get help for these animals even though no one would take responsibility... Thank You. I know I was frustrated by the lack of any agency willing to get involved, but it will not stop me from trying again next time I witness neglect.
This is some mighty poor and lopsided reporting. It appears apparent that the Times News gathered all this information from one source and made little attempt to validate the story or actively sort another opinion other than the one given. If the Times News actually investigated the site that Ms. Crum referred to, the obvious question would be, “How did the property get to such horrible and unhealthy conditions under her watch?” Prior to the bank taking ownership, these horses never had any noticeable feed in the pasture. My wife would break down into tears every time we needed to pass by the property. Many of us called seeking assistance in getting care for these animals to no avail. Thank heaven for the bank taking possession; it was the first time large bales of hay were present. A non-experienced person with desire and commitment is far better than one with total incompetence and/or ineffective.
Completely agree Leon!!! Thanks for the post. This was a sin to watch. Hopefully someone will step in and take control at the animals new location...
This article on Donna Crum makes my blood boil! Wish there were some actual facts to back up the details of the foreclose property. The pictures of Donna posing with the goat and the starving horses. Classic! Like she was a hero in this situation? Someone needs to write a story and that includes the real pictures. Dogs living in their own feces, horses with out food and water for days on end, no hoof care or vet care for horses, dogs infested with fleas. Where was Donna Crum??? Posing for a camera when the truth is she didn't do shit to save these animals. She helped the drug dealer owner take there animals back and put them back in a puppy mill situation. The horses where all thrown onto a large trailer together with the goat which only had three good legs and shipped south. Not one of those animals where saved by the "animals best friend". For the record you should know that the "evil bank" that locked them out took care of those animals for 32 days when Donna Crum and the animals actual owners who had full rights to care for their animals were no where to be found. The bank also had several foster families lined up and ready take animals. When the real pictures come out and the real story I hope she burns for this. As for Ms. Pretzman even if you only "like animals" you can't to worse than Donna Crum do your best and best of luck. There is a reason to got majority vote.
After reading this article I found myself asking, Donna Crum MUST have close tie with someone in the Times News. Maybe rather than spending so much time belittling Stephanie Pretzman and having so many articles written about herself she could have actually looked into the situation at the foreclosure property which contained the nine horses, nine dogs, one goat, 13 chickens and cat located on Strohls Valley Road in Lehighton. This foreclosure property is the former location of Nacoma Kennels which lost their kennel liscence due to breaking so many PA Kennel laws on top of that the horses were previously taken away due to neglect and only to get them back due to a flaw in paper work. The owners of the property knew for months that they would be losing their home and their property and failed to take the proper actions to care for their animals. Any true animal lover knows that if you can not care for your animals or afford them the best thing to do is find them a loving home. When Donna Crum was called out to the property when they lock-out occured and seeing the horrific conditions of these animals stated that it was "borderline neglect" Crum did not make any effort to save these animals. After 72 hours without the owner contacting the bank and trying to make arrangements for these animals it would be considered abandonment and the kind animals would all be able to recieve loving homes. Rather than allowing that to happen and finding the animals a better life Crum took it upon herself to contact the owner of the animals and give her the opportunity to continue to neglect her animals. The bank being animals lovers that they are did their research and hired an expierenced animal sitter to care for the animals. She has 15 years+ of horse expierence and vast knowledge about puppies and dogs. Posted below the picture of Donna with the goat at the foreclosure property- "Donna Crum examines the leg of a goat she has been caring for after the bank forced the owner off the property." This statement really caught me by suprise because Crum was only at the property at the most 5 times in the 32 days (I say 32 because the bank was kind enough to grant the owner an extra 2 days to remove her animals and personal property) and she had the banks caregiver take the picture. I realize that Donnna Crum has been involved in several animal rescues, but all those situations was emergencies and accidents. This ia a totally different situation at this forclosure property. They are neglected animals that Crum allowed and approved of being neglected. I may not know Stephanie Pretzman very well but I am sure she is perfectly qualified for the position. The only thing Crum cares about it feral cats.
Is this corruption ever going to stop? You could not have asked for a more qualified person for the job. What reasons could there possibly be for them not to hire her? This makes me think some members of council are only there for personal gains. What a shame.
When Donna Crum came before Slatington Borough Council for the position of Animal Control Officer, I told her I was blown away with her talents and skills. I still hold that position. I firmly believed she was the best candidate for our community and nominated her for the position. Unfortunately, 3 councilmen (Bryon Reed, Galen Freed and Russ Hallman) voted for their political pal’s daughter, Stephanie Prutzman, not the best candidate. Ms. Prutzman may be a nice person however, she has no formal training or work experience in animal control. When a Borough resident recently asked me how Ms. Prutzman would handle wildlife such as a skunk or raccoon, my answer was “she has no training in these matters”.
In an ironic twist, Ms. Prutzman recently had to call Donna Crum to ask for assistance in placing some stray animals. True to form, Ms. Crum was a complete professional and assisted Ms. Prutzman. Prutzman’s work for the Borough is a process of on the job training. Had Donna Crum been hired, she would have hit the bricks running using her training, talent, love of aninals and practical experience in animal control.
I have extended an invitation to Ms. Crum to come to Slatington whenever she would like to hold animal ownership training, CART training, etc. It would be my privilege to assist her anyway possible.
Kris Burek
Slatington Borough Council